The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced that the conforming loan limited for mortgages will remain at $417,000.
>The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) today announced
the conforming loan limit will remain $417,000 for 2009 for most areas in the U.S. but
specified higher limits in certain cities and counties. The conforming loan limit is the
maximum size of loans that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can purchase in 2009.
>According to provisions of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA), the
national loan limit is set based on changes in average home prices over the previous year,
but cannot decline from year to year. Loan limits for two-, three-, and four-unit properties
in 2009 will remain at 2008 levels as well: $533,850, $645,300, and $801,950
respectively, for homes in the continental U.S.
In theory, if housing markets continue to fall sharply in certain parts of the country, the implied mortgage risk will actually increase because the cap on the mortgage limit can not be reduced. Of course we are in the middle of a financial crisis caused by throwing risk out the window so it’s ironic that it’s actually against the best interests of the financial market to be more conservative in this regard. Probably because that’s not really the problem.
So we keep the loan limit the same again despite:
* declining market conditions
* change the name of the agency to FHFA from OFHEO (OFHEO was responsible for oversight of Fannie and Freddie before they needed to be bailed out)
* run by the same person as before who now suggests FHFA has plenty of ammunition (no offense intended to Mr. Lockhart).
From the contrarian department…
Yet here’s something new (hat tip to Holden Lewis of Mortgage Matters) that definitely doesn’t conform to longstanding rhetoric from someone who reported last year at this time about 5 months in a row that the problem with credit was temporary…
>[NAR Chief Economist Lawrence] Yun says, without giving specifics, that the federal government should step in to stabilize house prices. That’s quite a plea, coming from a representative of an organization that’s usually all for hands-off government. There’s nothing like a severe recession to make free-marketers abandon their principles with alacrity.
And the contrarian-contrarian department…
Here’s an opinion that’s contrarian to those who claim to be contrarian: lowball offers in a weak real estate market don’t work according to accomplished real estate author, writer, agent, speaker Ali Rogers, well-known for her book “Diary of a Real Estate Rookie”
>Some real estate gurus would argue that that’s okay, you should go ahead and make ridiculous offers, because if you’re willing to ask a gazillion people you’ll finally run down one exhausted one who will capitulate. Then, hey, it’s like you won the lottery.
>One problem with that strategy: I don’t generally think it works.