I took the photo of this door in NYS Supreme Court yesterday and it got me thinking about quality of “experts” as did this.
In a perfect world, any appraiser or analyst (in any profession) should be forced to provide expert witness testimony in court at least once – covering a paper they’ve written, research they have presented, an opinion they’ve formed, a sales pitch they’ve developed, heck even a blog post they’ve posted.
I actually like providing testimony and our firm does a fair amount of this work for our clients. Getting grilled for hours and even days by lawyers trying only to chip away at your credibility in front of others provides amazing clarity to the way you approach your analysis and profession (aside from being exhausting).
Many talking heads that opine on a housing market, a stock, a court case, etc. often aren’t tested to fully articulate their thoughts, assuming they are even thinking. Hence, BS reigns.
Tags: expert, testimony, expert witness, court
I’ve been an expert for about eight years and never really looked at it this way. Thanks. Good perspective.
I too have hours getting grilled on my expertise and do feel some satisfaction that the lawyers really can’t put a dent in my opinions.